Expanded Birth Injury Materials Added At Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers

As medical malpractice lawyers involved in different types of birth injury cases, we recognize that the specific events that occur behind the scenes can be difficult to compartmentalize.  While the fact patterns behind different incidents may vary-- or overlap, the following areas have become consistent aspects in some of our cases.  Consequently, we have expanded the birth injury section at Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, to further refine the expanse of birth injury cases we get involved with.

birth injury lawyers

Please take a moment and review this expanded section with pages devoted to:

Of course, no family anticipates that these terms will ever become part of their vocabulary.  However, if the situation should arise, our team of medical malpractice attorneys remains committed to seeing your case through with the interest of you and your child first and foremost.

Don't Assume Your Child's Birth Injury Is Compensable

fetal heart monitorSome of the most prolific medical malpractice cases involve injuries sustained by children during the labor and delivery process.  I can’t image a warm-blooded-person who isn’t moved by the very thought of a severely disabled child who faces a lifetime of developmental difficulties and endless hours of specialized medical attention.

Despite their poignant tales, these children—or perhaps more accurately, the people bringing lawsuits on their behalves, still have the burden of establishing that their child’s injury derived from the negligence of the attending physician or hospital. 

That’s right, before these children receive a penny for their injuries or care-related expenses, the law says that they have the burden of proving the following:

  • The doctor and / or hospital has a duty to provide proper medical care for the child

The fact that a doctor-patient relationship exists is usually considered enough in most jurisdictions for a doctor to act in a professional manner and treat their patients with the skill that a reasonable doctor would provide.

  • The duty to provide reasonable medical care was breached by the treating doctor or hospital staff

Frequently, this part of the case proves to be the most difficult as it involves establishing what the ‘standard of care’ is for each procedure or circumstance presenting itself to the doctor.  While it may be easy to second-guess a physician’s decision after the fact, establishing how a prudent physician would act or react to circumstances presenting themselves can be difficult in light of the fact that there may be different opinions about how to handle certain circumstances.

In order to establish what exactly the standard of care is in each case, parties to a lawsuit typically rely upon expert witnesses.  While the name ‘expert witness’ correctly implies that the person is an expert in their profession.  The medical expert’s real role is to educate the jury as to what the proper way to do a procedure or response to a set of circumstances.

Just as an injured party has a opportunity to retain an expert witness(s) to prove their case, a doctor being sued for negligence can similarly retain his or her own expert witness to support that the things that they did were in fact correct.

  • The doctors breach of care resulted in injuries to the child

Similar to other types of personal injury cases, birth injury lawsuits place a burden on the person initiating the lawsuit in terms of establishing the injuries alleged are due to the act of the defendant doctor--- as opposed to the injuries occurring from another source.  Cases involving cerebral palsy and other types of birth injuries commonly involve allegations that the child’s condition resulted from a genetic abnormality or developmental complication as opposed to the conduct of a physician.

  • The child sustained damages

Most birth injury cases involve significant physical and cognitive loss, which require significant amounts of past and future care.  The plaintiff's in a birth injury case may use the services of a life-care planner to chronicle what type of medical equipment and care the child will require during each phase of their life.

As opposed to arguing that the child’s damages are not present, defendant doctors may simply allege that damages should not be considered because the plaintiff failed to establish that there was a deviation in the standard of care.

Simple enough?  Not so fast....

While the above elements of a birth injury case may seem simple enough, when complex medical issues are involved--- and credible experts from both sides advocate contradictory positions, the waters can quickly become quite murky.  Particularly when the presenting issues represent a judgment call, equally qualified physicians may have differing ways of addressing the issue.

I was again reminded about the uncertainties involved in birth injury lawsuits when I heard about a recent trial in Florida involving a three-year-old boy with significant physical disabilities.  After a mere forty minutes of deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant hospital and doctors.

The trial centered on the way that the hospital and physicians interpreted--- and responded to a situation involving fetal distress.  While there was no dispute that the child involved suffered profound injuries at birth due to an interruption of oxygen during the labor and delivery process that stemmed from a uterine rupture-- the alleged medical malpractice really came down to one word-- forseeability. 

The tipping point of the trial was how a reasonable physician would respond to the information gathered about the situation in light of the diagnostic testing and information provided by the mother.  Unlike most situations involving a uterine rupture—where a woman has a scar in her uterus from prior pregnancies or trauma--- the mother in this case, presented without any of the factors which could increase her chance of a uterine rupture.

While my heart goes out to this family and the struggles they certainly will face, situations such as this are telling of the uphill battle faced in most birth injury cases.  As a birth injury lawyer, one of the more difficult parts of my job is explaining to a family with a special needs child that they may not have a case because of the difficulty in establishing a breach of care or causation.

Therefore, I try bringing complicating issues to the families attention immediately if a consulting doctor identifies them during his or her case review.  While these are always difficult conversations to have, I think it’s important for families to understand the issues involved--- both positive --- and negative before we put the case in the hands of a jury.

Related:

Vero Beach jury finds hospital not liable in birth injuries that caused boy's disabilities TCPalm by Elliot Jones, January 24, 2012

Can a mother’s obstetric hemorrhage result in injury to the baby?

What is a uterine rupture and does it pose a danger to mother or baby?

Complications During Pregnancy, Such As Uterine Rupture, Put Mother At Risk

Hemorrhages (Uncontrolled Bleeding) During Delivery Must Be Carefully Monitored To Keep Mom & Baby Safe

Doctor's Error May Be Responsible To For Development Of Erb's Palsy Or Brachial Plexus Injury

The birthing process can be a stressful occasion for both parents, infant--- and physician. During a time in which physicians need to be cool and steady, there are those who get caught up in the moment and fail to follow good medical practice.

When a physician, or other delivery personnel, rush to evacuate the baby from the birth canal, they sometimes pull or push too hard on the infant's head or shoulders-- causing damage to an area around the baby's neck where the nerves from the arms connect with the neck and spine (brachial plexus).

deliveryA brachial plexus injury to a newborn can result in varying degrees of disability-- both from a short and long-term perspective.  The degree of impairment is usually determined by the type of injury to the nerves in the brachial plexus. There are four designated types of brachial plexus injuries in newborns:

  • Avulsion- When the nerves are torn from the spine. Usually results in the greatest degree of disability.
  • Rupture- A torn nerve, but still in contact with the spine.
  • Neuroma- A healed brachial plexus injury that resulted in scarring and continued nerve deficits
  • Neuropraxia- A stretching of the nerves.  The most common brachial plexus injury and generally the most easily healed.

Together, the above conditions usually result in varying degrees of weakness, sensation loss and immobility of the child's arm and hand.  When the conditions impact the child's use of the arm, they are commonly referred to as Erb's Palsy.

The location and severity of the brachial plexus injury will determine the child's prognosis.  However, experts agree to that in order to maximize the chances of the significant recovery, physicians need to identify and begin treating the injury as soon as feasible.

Though surgery to re-attach the nerves may be acceptable in some cases of Erb's Palsy, most cases involving avulsions and ruptures of the nerve never completely resolve.  Sadly, as children develop, the bodies ability to recover from these types of injuries begins to decline and many cases of Erb's Palsy result in permanent disability.

In cases where a child sustained an injury to his brachial plexus during birth and has not recovered fully from the injury, the situation may give rise to a lawsuit against the physician or staff who delivered the child.  Some jurisdictions permit a child afflicted with a Brachial Plexus injury to recover for:

  • Past and future medical expenses
  • Disability
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Disfigurement
  • Pain and suffering

Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers handle child delivery-related complications including Erb's Palsy and Cerebral Palsy.  We understand the emotional, physical and financial toll these conditions have on the entire family.  We offer free consultations and our services are free, if we can not recover for you. 

Brachial Plexus Injury Resources

Brachial Plexus Palsy Foundation

United Brachial Plexus Network

Brachial Plexus Neuropathies Support Group

Is Erb’s palsy associated with medical error during labor and delivery?

United Brachial Plexus Foundation

Doctor's Rough Handling Of Forceps During Delivery To Blame For Spinal Cord Injury To Child

forcep deliveryForceps are a tool available to doctors to assist with the delivery of babies in circumstances where the anatomy of the mother or positioning of the child requires assistance for a vaginal delivery.  In most situations where forceps are used, the doctor encountered some difficultly during the delivery process to necessitate utilization of this tool. 

While there indeed may be a sense of urgency to extract the baby, doctors need to be mindful of the dangers that can ensue when forceps aren’t used carefully and with a sure hand. 

Though uncommon, the aggressive use if forceps by doctors during delivery can result in serious injury to the baby.  The added leverage and force put upon the child with forceps may result in injury to the neck or spinal cord.

A birth injury lawsuit was recently resolved in which a boy’s spinal cord was catastrophically injured by a doctor delivering him who used forceps to extract the boy during pregnancy.  Paralyzed from the neck down, the boy requires a ventilator and other types of assistance. 

Now 10-years-old and with profound physical disabilities, the lawsuit alleged that the doctors aggressive use of forceps were to blame for the spinal cord injury.

Much of the undisclosed birth injury settlement will be used to pay for the significant medical expenses that the boy has required since birth and will require for the rest of his life.  Unlike most birth injury settlements, where settlements are made in a lump sum fashion, the terms of the settlement state that the hospital will make yearly payments to ensure that there is adequate funds to pay for the  medical care for the remainder of the child’s life.

Resources:

Damages for by paralysed due to forceps delivery BBC News, June 16, 2011

Kielland's forceps- association with neonatal morbidity and mortality (pdf) British Medical Journal, 1979, 1, 7-9

What does cephalohematoma indicate in a newborn baby?

Healthpages.org: Birth Injury & Trauma

Can the rough handling of forceps during delivery lead to neurological injury?

Lights, Camera, Baby Delivery! Are Parents Entitled To Film The Birth Of Their Children?

cameraphone.jpgFor some reason, my wife likes to keep her hand on her cell phone at all times--- mostly to capture every: laugh, cry, tumble, stumble, meal, activity, outfit, ect. of my son. 

I've long given up trying to explain to her that there's really no need to document his life in a moment-by-moment progression. 

On the other hand, her moment-by-moment photography has captured some pretty cool pictures that we would likely never have-- if it were not for her lightning-quick photography skills.

Apparently my wife isn't the only one intent on preserving most of my son's development though a camera (or cell phone) lens.  The New York Times had a provoking article, "Camera, and Rules Against Them, Stir Passions in Delivery Rooms" which discusses the frequent desire of parents to capture their child's first moments breathing air versus many medical facilities desire to restrict photography in the delivery rooms over fear of potential litigation.

While I can appreciate the fact that hospitals want to protect the privacy of other patients and staff (most of whom are masked and simply unrecognizable), I feel like the real reason hospitals are restricting the use of cameras, phones and video cameras is to minimize the chance that the video of the birth delivery can be used against them.  The Times article discusses several situations where the video of the baby delivery was used as a crucial piece of evidence subsequent medical malpractice lawsuits against the physician. 

As a medical malpractice lawyer, I feel like this is just another attempt by medical facilities and doctors to make the prosecution of legitimate cases of negligence more difficult for families to prove.  A photograph or video of a specific situation can be far more probative of the truth than stacks of records that are prepared by physicians and staff without the input of the patients.

Further, while a video of a negligent act my assist in the prosecution of a birth injury case, wouldn't the flip-side be true as well and physicians could use such recordings in their defense?

About Jonathan Rosenfeld

Photo of Jonathan Rosenfeld

About Jonathan Rosenfeld My law practice is focused on representing the most vulnerable members of our society in claims and lawsuits...

Read More

Subscribe

Add this blog to your feeds or subscribe by email using the form below

Begin the process of learning the legal options available for your child today.

Bed Sore FAQs

Frequently asked questions on bed sore prevention, treatment and legal rights of those who have been neglected.

View FAQs
Nursing Home Laws - View Laws by State