Backing Up Vehicles: Will Cameras Prevent Injuries To Pedestrians?

backing up camera on carThe mention of a pedestrian injury usually conjures up images of a driver hitting a pedestrian with the front of their vehicle.  Though far less common, backing up vehicle injuries remain a source of significant injury to pedestrians-- young and old.  

An alarming 17,000 people are injured every year when vehicles 'back' into them.  Backing up vehicles also account for an average 288 pedestrian deaths each year when vehicles back over pedestrians in the rear of the vehicle.

While keeping a cautious lookout can surely help prevent some of these car accidents from occurring, the fact remains that vehicle design compounded with certain angles in which pedestrians may be positioned--- gives many drivers very little opportunity to detect what is in back of them.

A proposal by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration aims to reduce the alarming number of 'backing up' accidents by requiring the installation of built in cameras and viewing screens to give drivers a better view of what is in the path of their vehicle as they drive in reverse.

While the proposal still has to be approved by congress, I applaud this pedestrian safety technology.  For a mere $160-200 per vehicle, this technology is a bargain compared with the toll such backing injuries put upon pedestrians--- who frequently sustain life-altering injuries when they are crushed or pinned beneath a backing up vehicle.

Related Child Injury Law Blog Entries:

Cars In Parking Lots Pose A Real Danger To Child- Pedestrians

Don't Bother Giving Statements To Insurance Companies After An Accident

Kids' Fractures Require Special Attention To Avoid Complications Down The Road

New Safety Program Aims To Reduce Number Of Pedestrians Hit By Vehicles In Chicago

dark crosswalkMore than 10 pedestrians are are struck by vehicles in the Chicagoland-area every day. Statistics tell us that many of these pedestrians suffer serious injuries or death in these incidents.

In an attempt to improve pedestrian safety at busy crosswalks around schools, senior citizen centers and hospitals, The Chicago Department of Transportation has installed buckets containing brightly colored flags for pedestrians to use while crossing the street. The flags are intended to get drivers' attention while the pedestrians cross the street in areas without traffic signals.

The addition of street crossing flags to crosswalks is the most recent addition to the City of Chicago's driver safety program, "It's Up To You" which is intended to make drivers more aware of the dangers posed to pedestrians.  As part of the program, city officials placed mannequins near downtown intersections with t-shirts reading, " One of 32 pedestrians killed last year in Chicago."  Similarly, the program has installed placards inside of taxis to encourage passengers to report dangerous driving to city officials.

According to a Chicago Tribune article, "Flags are newest weapon in city's pedestrian safety push" on the implementation of the traffic safety flag program, the flags are available at the following intersections:

  • 71st Street and Spaulding Avenue, near Tarkington Elementary School
  • Central Avenue and Walton Street, near Brunson Elementary School
  • Belmont and Kilpatrick avenues, near a senior housing building
  • 93rd Street and Oglesby Avenue, near Trinity Hospital
  • 63rd Street and Talman Avenue, near a senior center
  • 50th Street and Cottage Grove Avenue, near Hales Franciscan High School
  • Devon and Francisco avenues, near the Croatian Cultural Center
  • 64th Street and Western Avenue, near Claremont Academy
  • 79th and Throop streets, near a senior housing building
  • Elston Avenue and Grace and Bernard streets, near Murphy Elementary School

As a personal injury lawyer who frequently sees the horrific injuries related to vehicle v. pedestrian collisions, I applaud this latest addition to the City's pedestrian safety program.  Hopefully, this program will help save lives as the flags will greatly improve pedestrian visibility. 

Related:

Uninsured Motorist Coverage Can Help Children Who Have Been The Victim Of Hit-And-Run Auto Accidents

Chicago Drivers Must Stop For Pedestrians In Crosswalk.... Or Pay Up

Are Facebook & Twitter To Blame For Car Accidents?

80% Of Vehicle-Pedestrian Accidents Occur Within Crosswalks

Don't Bother Giving Statements To Insurance Companies After An Accident

recorder.jpgIn the days following a personal injury accident, many injured people receive an outpouring of calls and messages from friends, family and.... insurance adjusters.  While it may be easy to give the insurance adjuster a return call while in the call returning mode, the fact remains that insurance adjusters are not your friends.  

From a personal perspective, insurance adjusters and the investigators they commonly associate with may be good, fine people.  However, as soon as a car accident, fall, or any other type of personal injury occurs, their interest is directly opposed to yours.  

Truth be told, the insurance companies for responsible parties have a job to do in terms of defending their insured's rights.  What many injured people fail to appreciate is that by taking an oral or written statement from you, they are actually in the process of assembling a case against you!  That's right, the friendly voice on the telephone who seems sincerely concerned about your physical condition is jotting down notes about your injuries and medical care in order to minimize or deny payments down the road.

As a personal injury lawyer, I consistently find insurance companies trying to gain the upper hand in the claims process from the moments following an incident.  While it may be completely legal, I strongly suggest injured parties resist the temptation to discuss any aspect how an incident occurred or their injuries with anyone aside from their immediate family, doctor or lawyer.

You never mentioned that!

Though I've never been to a training session for insurance adjusters, I imagine the insurance companies spend a good deal of time teaching their representatives how to take a recorded statement that is supportive of the companies position.  In reality, it's not that hard considering that few people indeed know what their rights are or even consider how a short statement can impact the course of their claim for years to come.

Just recently, I was retained by the family of a teenage boy who was struck by a car as he crossed the street.  Unfortunately, the impact resulted in fractures to the boy's leg and hip.  The family came to see me after they received a letter from the insurance company that they were denying the boy's claim.

Delay, Delay, Delay

During our meeting, I quickly understood the underlying reasons for the denial.  After returning from the hospital, a representative from the insurance company made a house call to the boy's home under the guise of 'just wanting to see how he's doing'.  Within a five minute discussion (taken on a tape recorder) the boy divulged that he had injured the same leg in a soccer practice years before, but also that he was listening to music at the time of the incident.  

While these two tidbits, likely have nothing to do with the driver's failure to keep a proper watch or extent of the boy's injuries, they arguably provide enough information for the insurance company to deny payment on the claim in a pre-litigation context.

As I prepare to file the lawsuit in this case, I am again reminded that the the handling of personal injury claims is a business-- and indeed a very big one-- for insurance companies.  If you think about it--- and I'm sure many, many actuaries have-- the denial or minimal offer on a legitimate personal injury claim is simply good business for the insurance company.  For one or two years during the course of litigation, they get to hold onto the money for the claim and invest it or do as they wish with with it.  While some insurance companies do have to pay their attorneys to represent them, many lawyers who do insurance defense work have relatively low rates and many times are on retainer--- meaning it doesn't cost the insurance company an extra penny to litigate the claim. 

For a large insurance company with thousands of claims, the cost benefit of completely denying or offering substandard payments can be substantial!  Consider the time value of money for a significant injury case worth $500,000?  If an insurance company conservatively invests the money during a two year litigation process at 3%, the company has effectively made an extra $30,450 by simply holding on to their money.  When similar calculations are spread amongst the thousands of open claims, the added benefits to the insurance company afforded by the delay is staggering!

As a lawyer who regularly goes to court, litigating another case is nothing new or especially burdensome to me.   In fact, I enjoy going to court and trying tough cases for my clients, but when I think about the inefficiencies created by an insurance companies delay and deny claims handling practice, I get downright disgusted.

So what's the answer?

Rather than try to instruct clients on what information may be disclosed or how to answer queries about liability or the extent of their injuries, I've simply adopted a 'no contact' policy for all clients when it comes to their involvement with insurance companies.   There is no legal obligation (outside of uninsured or under-insured motorist matters), to provide insurance companies any personal information prior to filing a lawsuit.  Why given them an upper hand?

Related:

7 Steps To Help Your Child's Personal Injury Or Medical Malpractice Case

Can You Afford Not To Speak To A Lawyer Following Your Child's Injury?

80% Of Vehicle-Pedestrian Accidents Occur Within Crosswalks

Kids' Fractures Require Special Attention To Avoid Complications Down The Road

80% Of Vehicle-Pedestrian Accidents Occur Within Crosswalks

crosswalk.jpgAfter reading the Chicago Tribune's article "City Study: Chicago pedestrians in crosswalks are in cross hairs", I'm definitely going to step-up my level of caution before crossing the street.  

Once again, I'm continually impressed with how drivers continue to ignore pedestrians--- even when they are crossing the street within the crosswalks.  

After evaluating traffic data from 2005 through 2009, a staggering 80% of all traffic accidents involving pedestrians who were injured or killed occurred when the person was within the seemingly safe confines of the crosswalk. While pedestrian deaths, have declined fairly significantly from 1994 to 2009, the total number of traffic accidents involving pedestrians remains fairly consistent at around 3,000 per year within the confines of the city.

Other data tidbits from the Chicago Tribune article:

  • Hit-and-run accidents account for 33% of all pedestrian accidents
  • Hit-and-run accidents account for 41% of pedestrian deaths
  • Teens come the largest segment of crash victims
  • Taxi cabs account for almost one-third of all pedestrian crashes
  • Areas of Chicago with higher incidence of violent crime tended to have more pedestrian accidents

Is help on the way for pedestrians?

Recognizing the frequency and severity of these pedestrian accidents, some states and municipalities have enacted legislation to protect pedestrians.  Though it's still too early to tell, Illinois passed legislation last year that requires drivers to stop--- not just yield when a pedestrian is present within a crosswalk.

In addition to the legislation, new technology may provide an added level of safety for pedestrian trying to navigate their way through the streets of Chicago.  The City has plans to install pedestrian countdown clocks at all of the cities 2,900 intersections that both warn pedestrians how much time they have before a signal changes and provides additional warning to drivers to alert them that the crosswalk may be occupied.

Is driver carelessness to blame?

I remain cautiously optimistic that the new legislation and traffic control technology will help make pedestrians safer.  However, both as my experience as an injury lawyer and statistics tell us, pedestrian-vehicle accidents will most certainly remain a threat to every person walking across intersections until we can recalibrate drivers' behavior.

Chicago Transportation Commissioner Gabe Klein, believes a societal problem is to blame for the apparent indifference for the safety of our peers.  

Whether it is people getting hurt or killed by cars, or people getting shot in their living room by accident (during drive by shootings), which has happened all to often lately, there is a connection.  It's a certain recklessness in our society and in our city thus is causing too many innocent bystanders to get hurt.

While I hope Mr. Klein's somewhat cynical take on society is incorrect, I'm keeping my fingers crossed that new options can prod drivers to take a closer look at safe driving.

Related Child Injury Laws Blog Entries:

Uninsured Motorist Coverage Can Help Children Who Have Been The Victim Of Hit-And-Run Auto Accidents

Chicago Drivers Must Stop For Pedestrains In Crosswalk.... Or Pay Up

Are Facebook & Twitter To Blame For Car Accidents?

Are Facebook & Twitter To Blame For Car Accidents?

twitter

Is it really necessary to tell your friends where you're driving?  Or, what about the fantastic new Lady Gaga song?  What about the spicy hot dog with cheese you had for lunch?

Maybe I'm a bit out-dated (though you can still following the Child Injury Laws Blog on Facebook), but I really don't have any urgency to share my instantaneous thoughts with the world-- particularly when I'm on the road.

Apparently, I'm in the minority.  A recent Medill Report Chicago, article by Jeff Beck, "Facebook status: I'm in the car" detailed how many car manufacturers are adding "in-car connectivity" to their new models previewed at the Chicago Auto Show.  As if driving is not enough stimulation, the new products allow drivers to access social networks, e-mail and text while driving.

Even if some of these functions can be carried out via voice commands, it seems as though the new features are simply an invitation to interact as we drive.  I mean, what fun is it to announce to the world that you're 'stuck in traffic' if you can't access the responses from others showing compassion for your situation via responding to your update or tweet?

Frankly, I find the new technologies to be more of a distraction to drivers and a real threat to others on the road.

Ironically, within minutes of reading about this new auto-technology, I saw an article in the Chicago Tribune about a recently filed lawsuit that alleges that a driver struck and killed a pedestrian as she was updating her Facebook page with her cell phone! According to the lawsuit, a man exited his car and called 911 to notify them of an auto accident he was involved in-- at the exact same time the driver posted her Facebook update!

Surely, social networking has its place and utility, but we all must remember that no update is worth jeopardizing the safety of yourself or those around you.

Related:

Suit: Woman in fatal crash was updating Facebook Chicago Tribune, February 15, 2011

Texting Safety Campaign Promises To Reduce Number Of Distracted Drivers Child Injury Laws

Cell Phones and Driving: Review of Research (pdf) ANNE T. McCARTT, LAURIE A. HELLINGA, and KELI A. BRAITMAN Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, Virginia, USA

28 percent of accidents involve talking, texting on cellphones, By Ashley Halsey III , January 13, 2010 The Washington Post

Chicago Drivers Must Stop For Pedestrains In Crosswalk.... Or Pay Up

peopleincrosswalk.jpgUnknown to many, a new Illinois law took effect several months ago that forces drivers to stop for pedestrians within the confines of a crosswalk. 

The new law is far more restrictive that the former law merely required drivers to 'yield' to pedestrians within crosswalks.  Similarly, the new crosswalk law applies to all intersections, not just those controlled by traffic signals.

I was glad to see an article by Jon Halkevitch in the Chicago Tribune regarding efforts by the Chicago Police Department to ramp up enforcement of the new law.  Just last month, Chicago officers wrote 127 tickets to drivers who failed to yield to pedestrians in undercover sting operations where plain-clothes officers pose as plain-jane citizens trying to cross the street.

As the new law takes hold, I certainly hope it effectively reduces the number of traffic-related injuries and deaths in Illinois.  According to the Illinois Department of Transportation:

  • 6,000 pedestrians are hit by cars annually
  • 170 pedestrians are killed in auto-related accidents every year
  • More than 1,000 pedestrians are seriously injured every year
  • In Chicagoland alone, 12 pedestrians were killed last year

The amount of the fine drivers face is based upon where the incident occurred, but ranges from $50 to $500.

I applaud this important piece of legislation that promises to improve the safety of pedestrians in Illinois.  In addition to hopefully preventing injuries and deaths, the new law will also make the prosecution of personal injury lawsuits involving injured pedestrians somewhat easier given the clear and direct language of the law.

Related:

Active Transportation Alliance

Cars In Parking Lots Pose A Real Danger To Child- Pedestrians

parkinglotOver the past few weeks, I've been spending a lot more time shopping than I normally do.  With a recent move, I've been hitting the Home Depot - Container Store - Bed Bath & Beyond circuit pretty hard. 

In addition to doing my part to jump start the economy, I've noticed just how dangerous the parking lots in these places can be for adult and child pedestrians alike.

Weird aisle angles, lots of cluttered shopping carts and people in a hurry to get an item on sale-- are just a few of the reasons parking lots remain a treacherous area for pedestrians.

Unlike the well marked streets in our towns and cities, parking lots really seem to take a page from the 'wild west' where its every person for themselves.  Nonetheless, the even without many of the commonly marked street safety signs and signals, drivers must continue to use their common sense and good judgment when driving in parking lots.

Fortunately, most drivers in parking lots have the good judgment to drive slowly as they go about their business.  In this sense, many accidents are avoided and impacts are minimized.  However, even low speeds pose a real threat to pedestrians --- and children in particular. 

Over the years, I've represented child and adult pedestrians who have been struck by vehicles in parking lots.  Some of the injuries have resulted from being knocked down.  However, other injuries are far more serious with fractures and crushing injuries that result from being struck and 'run over' by a vehicle.

With some basic safety guidelines, we can improve the safety in parking lots:

Drivers:

  • Drivers should continue to use traffic signals (turn signals and horns) as if they were on the road
  • Park in less congested areas of the lot
  • Drive slowly
  • Yield to pedestrians
  • Park within the confines of the marked space
  • Turn on headlights when appropriate

Pedestrians:

  • Adults should carry or hold the hands of their children
  • Always look out for cars
  • Don't carry any items that may obstruct your view
  • Put shopping carts back in their appropriate areas
  • Look and listen for cars
  • Never assume a driver sees you

If you involved in an incident in a parking lot, make sure you get necessary medical attention initially. Then, you should contact the local police department and complete a report (if possible at the scene).  Finally, if you or your child is injured, it is important to speak with a car accident attorney before you speak to the other drivers insurance carrier. 

Related:

Fatal pedestrian injuries to young children: a different pattern of injury (PDF) by ROBERT J. BRISON, MD, MPH, KRISTINEWICKLUND, PHD, AND BETH A. MUELLER, DRPH, American Journal of Public Health

Reducing Childhood Pedestrian Injuries, Summary of a multidesciplinary conference, Edited by Richard A Schieber, MD, MPH and Maria E Vegega, PhD, Injury Prevention

Uninsured Motorist Coverage Can Help Children Who Have Been The Victim Of Hit-And-Run Auto Accidents

children at playLast week I met with the family of a seven-year-old boy who received horrific orthopedic injuries (fractured tibia and fibula with de-gloving of his leg) he sustained due to being hit by a car as he was crossing the street with friends. 

The driver completely ignored a traffic signal before hitting the boy and racing away before their plates could be written down.

Several months after the incident-- and several leg and arm surgeries later, the boy’s parents called to tell me about the incident and inquired as to what if anything they could do for their son who has incurred significant medical bills and will need extensive future medical attention.

While the lack of a responsible party in a situation like the one above may appear problematic from a tort-recovery standpoint, this is exactly the type of situation that uninsured motorist covered was intended for.

Unbeknownst to most drivers, they likely have un-insured (UM) and under-insured motorist (UIM) coverage as part of their existing automobile insurance.  Like all types of insurance coverage, UM / UIM is something most of us don’t want to think about—yet when a situation arises we are grateful we have it.

Un-Insured Motorist (UM) Coverage:

Exactly like it sounds, un-insured motorist coverage covers injuries and property damage sustained in auto accidents in which the at-fault driver did not have any insurance coverage for the incident.  Consequently, the damages from the incident can be recovered pursuant to the un-insured motorist coverage in the auto policy.

Many uninsured motorist cases can be resolved relatively quickly by negotiating with the insurance company.  However, when an agreement between the injured party and the insurance carrier cannot be achieved, most policies allow the injured person to file a demand for arbitration or a direct action against the insurance carrier directly.

The language of the policy and the jurisdiction where the claim is being pursued with dictate the procedure for resolving disputed UM claims.  Nonetheless, most policies require confirmation from the un-insured driver directly or the secretary of state that there was no insurance coverage before they will consider resolving the UM claim.

Under-Insured Motorist (UIM) Coverage:

Some states, such as Illinois, have passed legislation requiring drivers to carry a minimum amount of automobile insurance.  In theory, the minimum amounts of coverage would adequately compensate most automobile related injuries and property damage.

However, as you can imagine, legislating to cover the bulk of injuries and damages, will not cover most severe injuries where people have sustained truly life-altering damages.

When the responsible driver does not have adequate insurance to cover the damages of the person(s) injured in the accident, the injured party can pursue the balance of their damages directly from their insurance carrier under their under-insured motorist coverage.

The assumption with under-insured motorist coverage is that the amount of coverage exceeds that of the tort-feasor or person who caused the accident. 

For example, if the responsible party carries $100,000 in liability coverage and the injured party has $100,000 in UIM coverage, they would not be entitled to make a UIM claim since the coverage is equal.  However, in the same situation, the injured party carried $1,000,000 in UIM coverage, they could potentially recover $900,000 in UIM benefits.

Obviously, in order to recover UIM benefits, the injured party has the burden of establishing their damages similar to the way damages must be established in a personal injury lawsuit against the driver.

What types of accidents are covered by under-insured motorist or un-insured motorist insurance?

Most uninsured and under-insured motorist policies cover both the insured driver(s) and members of their household who have been involved in various types of auto-related accidents including:

  • Pedestrian accidents
  • Bicycle accidents
  • Hit-and-run accidents
  • Injuries sustained while a passenger on a commercial vehicle
  • Wrongful death
  • Children who are passengers in cars-- even those who are driven by their parents

The elements of recoverable damages under UM / UIM policies are also similar to those afforded an injured party in a traditional lawsuit:

  • Past and future medical expenses
  • Lost wages
  • Pain and suffering
  • Disfigurement

Certainly, when faced with a situation where a child or other member of your family has sustained severe injuries, it is important to evaluate all avenues for potential recovery including: un-insured and under-insured motorist coverage.  I strongly suggest you review your automobile insurance policy very carefully with a lawyer who has experience with these claims before speaking to the insurance company.

Related: 

Hit-and-Run Forum

Fatal Pedestrian Collisions Driver Negligence (pdf) by SUSAN P. BAKER, MPH, LEON S. ROBERTSON, PhD and BRIAN O'NEILL, BSc

4-Year-Old Dies In Hit-And-Run Crash KCTV.com, September 20, 2010

About Jonathan Rosenfeld

Photo of Jonathan Rosenfeld

About Jonathan Rosenfeld My law practice is focused on representing the most vulnerable members of our society in claims and lawsuits...

Read More

Subscribe

Add this blog to your feeds or subscribe by email using the form below

Begin the process of learning the legal options available for your child today.

Bed Sore FAQs

Frequently asked questions on bed sore prevention, treatment and legal rights of those who have been neglected.

View FAQs
Nursing Home Laws - View Laws by State